Lawmakers in California saw an opportunity to curb the emission of climate-destructive gases at our landfills by requiring yard trimmings, food scraps, and food/beverage-soiled paper products to be composted instead of buried with the rest of our waste. In 2016, Senate Bill 1383 was passed requiring all residents and businesses to separate or divert their organic waste from their landfill waste with a dedicated green bin. RethinkWaste contracts with two California-based composting facilities to process everything from our neighborhoods and turn it into finished compost, a nutrient-rich soil additive that improves the health of the soil without the use of chemical fertilizers.
We are lucky to have access to a composting infrastructure that can process all kinds of green waste. Nationally there are over 3,000 composting facilities processing yard trimmings, but only about 200 of those facilities also accept food scraps. Many composters are skeptical about taking food scraps because of the expected contamination that comes with it. Food packaging is often not separated from the food itself and ends up in the feedstock, the material coming into a composting facility.
According to a 2024 report by the Composting Consortium, an industry collaboration led by the Center for the Circular Economy at Closed Loop Partners, conventional plastic is the number one contaminant of compost feedstock at facilities accepting food scraps. Those facilities have costs associated with cleaning the material before it can be used to make healthy compost. Smaller facilities often rely solely on manual screening, while some larger facilities make use of screening equipment or technology, like AI. But any type of screening process takes extra time and money for the facility to carry out.
It is important for composting facilities to preserve the quality of their final product, the finished compost, because better compost preserves our environment as well as the composter’s revenue and reputation. Composting facilities are key players in the circular economy of our nation’s food, so as we move forward with diverting food scraps from landfills, it will be critical to support their operations.
The Composting Consortium’s report shows that even with current best practices and up to 95% contamination removal rates, 40% of the surveyed composting facilities still ended up with trace amounts of conventional plastic in the finished compost. That product is still sold and used on farmland, where microplastics may accumulate in the soil or get washed out to sea with stormwater. To determine what that means for the ecosystem and our own health we need more scientific study. For now, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) National Organic Program (NOP) is not taking any chances and requires that compost and compost feedstock be exclusively made from plant and animal materials for certified organic farms.
With plastic so ubiquitous in our environment today, composting facilities are facing what seems like a daunting task when it comes to producing clean, healthy compost. It would be helpful for consumers to do their part and keep plastic out of their green bins, but even that can be difficult with all the different compostable and look-alike products made with conventional plastic out in the marketplace. What is promising is that institutions like the Biodegradable Products Institute (BPI) are working with packaging manufacturers to design features that help consumers reliably identify certified compostables. Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policies, like Senate Bill 54, could also help provide the funds for composting facilities to expand their screening operations and clean up the contamination that comes in with food waste.
Clean composting would benefit the entire community by reducing methane emissions from the slow, unnatural breakdown of green waste at landfills and, instead, providing healthy compost to fertilize agricultural lands and beyond. Refer to your service guides and make sure you’re sorting your waste properly!











